Logo Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación en Matemática Educativa

Artículos

Vol. 16 No 1 (2013): Marzo

¿QUÉ CONOCIMIENTOS Y CONCEPCIONES MOVILIZAN FUTUROS MAESTROS ANALIZANDO UN VÍDEO DE AULA?

Soumis
juillet 13, 2023
Publiée
2023-07-13

Résumé

L'utilisation de la vidéo pour une classe d'élèves en école primaire (EP) durant la formation des futurs instituteurs confère un certain réalisme aux discussions théoriques qui ont lieu dans les cours de formation des instituteurs (l'équivalent en France des IUFM) en contribuant à la création de liens entre théorie et pratique basés sur des processus réflexifs qui permettent aux étudiants d'aller au-delà des habituels commentaires généraux. L'objectif de la présente étude consiste à identifier les conceptions sur l'enseignement et l'apprentissage des mathématiques ainsi qu'à s'interroger sur la connaissance mathématique pour l'enseignement (en particulier, la connaissance des mathématiques et l'enseignement des mathématiques et les étudiants) qu'un groupe de futurs instituteurs utilise lorsqu'il observe une vidéo conçue pour l'école primaire. Grâce à un travail de recherche qui va de pair avec une expérience sur l'enseignement (Steffe et Thompson, 2000) (dans lequel un travail propre à l'enseignement conçu pour les futurs instituteurs portant sur l'introduction du concept de division s'affine de plus en plus au fur et à mesure que des cycles successifs de mises en œuvre et d'analyse sont utilisés), on montre comment l'analyse de situations en école primaire suscite le questionnement des futurs instituteurs.

Références

  1. Alsawaie, O. N. & Alghazo, I. M. (2010). The effect of video-based approach on prospective teachers’ ability to analyze mathematics teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 13(3), 223-241. DOI: 10.1007/s10857-009-9138-8
  2. Ball, D. L. (1991). Research on Teaching Mathematics: Making Subject Matter Knowledge Part of the Equation. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in Research on Teaching (Vol. 2, pp. 1-48). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  3. Ball, D. L. (2000). Bridging practices: Intertwining content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach. Journal of Teacher Education 51(3), 241-247. DOI: 10.1177/0022487100051003013
  4. Ball, D. L; Thames, M. & Phelps, J. (2008). Content Knowledge for Teaching: What Makes It Special? Journal of Teacher Education 59(5), 389-407. DOI: 10.1177/0022487108324554
  5. Bardin, L. (1986). L´analyse de contenu. Paris, Francia: PUF.
  6. Bravo, L. (1996). ¿Qué es el vídeo educativo?. Comunicar 6, 100-105.
  7. Brophy, J. (2004). Using video in teacher education. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching (Vol. 10, pp. 259-286). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
  8. Carrillo, J. & Contreras, L. C. (1995). Un modelo de categorías e indicadores para el análisis de las concepciones del profesor sobre la matemática y su enseñanza. Educación Matemática 7(3), 79-92.
  9. Carrillo, J. & Climent, N. (2008). From professional tasks in collaborative environments to educational tasks in mathematics teacher education. In B. Clarke, B. Grevholm & R. Millman (Eds.), Tasks in Primary Mathematics Teacher Education: Purpose, Use and Exemplars (Vol. 4, pp. 215-234). New York, EE.UU.: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-09669-8_15
  10. Clarke, D. & Hollingsworth, H. (2000). Seeing is understanding. Journal of Staff Development 21(4), 40-43.
  11. Climent, N. & Carrillo, J. (2007). El uso del vídeo para el análisis de la práctica en entornos colaborativos. Investigación en la Escuela 61, 23-35.
  12. Design-Based Researcher Collective (2003). Design- Based Research: An Emerging paradigm for Educational Inquiry. Educational Researcher 32(1), 5-8.
  13. Flavell, J.H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist 34(10), 906-911. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
  14. Goffree, F. & Oonk, W. (2001). Digitizing real teaching practice for teacher education programmes: the MILE approach. In F. Lin & T. Cooney (Eds.), Making Sense of Mathematics Teacher Education (pp. 111-146). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI: 1874/ 127929
  15. González, J. & Wagenaar, R. (Eds.). (2003). Tuning educational structures in Europe. Informe final. Fase uno. Bilbao, España: Universidad de Deusto y Universidad de Groningen.
  16. Guba, E. & Lincoln, Y. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 105-117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  17. Kazemi, E. & Hubbard, A. (2008). New Directions for the Design and Study of Professional Development: Attending to the Coevolution of Teachers’ Participation across Contexts. Journal of Teacher Education 59 (5), 428-441. DOI: 10.1177/0022487108324330
  18. Koc, Y., Peker, D. & Osmanoglu, A. (2009). Supporting teacher professional development through online video case study discussions: An assemblage of preservice and inservice teachers and the case teacher. Teaching and Teacher Education 25 (8), 1158–1168. DOI: 10.1016/ j.tate.2009.02.020
  19. Lampert, M., & Ball, D.L. (1998). Teaching, Multimedia and Mathematics: Investigations of Real Practice. New York, EE.UU.: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
  20. Leikin, R. & Zazkis, R. (2010). Learning Through Teaching Mathematics. Development of teachers’ knowledge and expertise in practice. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
  21. Lin, P. J. (2005). Using research-based video-cases to help pre-service primary teachers conceptualize a contemporary view of mathematics teaching. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 3, 351–377.
  22. Llinares, S. & Valls, J. (2010). Prospective primary mathematics teachers’ learning from on-line discussions in a virtual video-based environment. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 13 (2), 177-196. DOI: 10.1007/s10857-009-9133-0
  23. Masingila, J. O. & Doerr, H. M. (2002). Understanding pre-service teachers’ emerging practices through their analysis of a multimedia case study of practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 5 (3), 235–263.
  24. Mason, J. (2002). Researching your own practice: The discipline of noticing. London, England: Routledge Falmer.
  25. Mochón, S. & Morales, M. (2010). En qué consiste el “conocimiento matemático para la enseñanza” de un profesor y cómo fomentar su desarrollo: un estudio en la escuela primaria. Educación Matemática 22 (1), 87-113.
  26. Pajares, M.F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research 62 (3), 307-332. DOI: 10.3102/00346543062003307
  27. Perrenoud, P.H. (2004). Diez nuevas competencias para enseñar. Barcelona, España: Graó.
  28. Ponte, J.P. (1994). Mathematics teachers’ professional knowledge. In J. P. da Ponte & J. F. Matos (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18th International Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. (Vol. 1, pp. 195-210). Lisboa, Portugal: University of Lisbon.
  29. Rodríguez, P. (2000). Los medios como recurso reflexivo en las Prácticas para ser Maestro. Comunicar 14, 200-207.
  30. Santagata, R., Zannoni, C. & Stigler, J. W. (2007). The role of lesson analysis in pre-service teacher education: an empirical investigation of teacher learning from a virtual video-based field experience. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 10 (2), 123-140. DOI: 10.1007/s10857007-9029-9
  31. Schuck, S. (1996). Chains in primary teacher mathematics education courses: An analysis of powerful constraints. Mathematics Education Research Journal 8 (2), 119-136.
  32. Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher 15 (2), 4-14. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X015002004
  33. Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform. Harvard Educational Review 57 (1), 1-22.
  34. Sorto, M. A., Marshall, J. H., Luschei, T. F. & Carnoy, M. (2009). Teacher knowledge and teaching in Panama and Costa Rica: A comparative study in primary and secondary education. Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación en Matemática Educativa 12 (2), 251-290.
  35. Sosa, L. (2011). Conocimiento matemático para la enseñanza en Bachillerato. Un estudio de dos casos. Huelva, España: Universidad de Huelva. (Disponible en http://rabida.uhu.es/dspace// handle/10272/4509)
  36. Star, J. R. & Strickland, S. K. (2008). Learning to observe: Using video to improve preservice mathematics teachers’ ability to notice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 11 (2), 107-125. DOI: 10.1007/s10857-007-9063-7
  37. Steffe, L. & Thompson, P. W. (2000). Teaching experiment methodology: underlying principles and essential elements. In A. Nelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 267-306). Mahwah: NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  38. Viseu, F. & Ponte, J.P. (2009). Desenvolvimento do conhecimento didáctico do futuro professor de matemática com apoio das TIC. Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación en Matemática Educativa 12 (3), 383-413.
  39. Zeichner, K.M. (1993). El maestro como profesional reflexivo. Cuadernos de pedagogía 220,44-49.