Logo Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación en Matemática Educativa

Artículos

Vol. 16 N.º 1 (2013): Marzo

¿QUÉ CONOCIMIENTOS Y CONCEPCIONES MOVILIZAN FUTUROS MAESTROS ANALIZANDO UN VÍDEO DE AULA?

Submetido
julho 13, 2023
Publicado
2023-07-13

Resumo

O uso de vídeos de sessões de aula de Educação Primária (EP) na formação inicial do professor oferece realismo às discussões teóricas sobre as aulas de magistério, contribuindo para a vinculação entre a teoria e a pràtica sobre a base de processos reflexivos que ajudam a transcender os habituais comentários genéricos dos estudantes para professores (EPM). O objetivo deste estudo é identificar as concepções sobre o ensino e a aprendizagem da matemática, assim como o conhecimento matemático para o ensino (particularmente o conhecimento de matemática e o ensino e o conhecimento de matemática e dos estudantes) que um grupo de EPM põe em jogo quando observa a um vídeo de EP. Através de uma criação de pesquisa consistente com um experimento de ensino (Steffe e Thompson, 2000), destaca-se como a análise de situações de ensino em EP promove o questionamento dos EPM.

Referências

  1. Alsawaie, O. N. & Alghazo, I. M. (2010). The effect of video-based approach on prospective teachers’ ability to analyze mathematics teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 13(3), 223-241. DOI: 10.1007/s10857-009-9138-8
  2. Ball, D. L. (1991). Research on Teaching Mathematics: Making Subject Matter Knowledge Part of the Equation. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in Research on Teaching (Vol. 2, pp. 1-48). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  3. Ball, D. L. (2000). Bridging practices: Intertwining content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach. Journal of Teacher Education 51(3), 241-247. DOI: 10.1177/0022487100051003013
  4. Ball, D. L; Thames, M. & Phelps, J. (2008). Content Knowledge for Teaching: What Makes It Special? Journal of Teacher Education 59(5), 389-407. DOI: 10.1177/0022487108324554
  5. Bardin, L. (1986). L´analyse de contenu. Paris, Francia: PUF.
  6. Bravo, L. (1996). ¿Qué es el vídeo educativo?. Comunicar 6, 100-105.
  7. Brophy, J. (2004). Using video in teacher education. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching (Vol. 10, pp. 259-286). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
  8. Carrillo, J. & Contreras, L. C. (1995). Un modelo de categorías e indicadores para el análisis de las concepciones del profesor sobre la matemática y su enseñanza. Educación Matemática 7(3), 79-92.
  9. Carrillo, J. & Climent, N. (2008). From professional tasks in collaborative environments to educational tasks in mathematics teacher education. In B. Clarke, B. Grevholm & R. Millman (Eds.), Tasks in Primary Mathematics Teacher Education: Purpose, Use and Exemplars (Vol. 4, pp. 215-234). New York, EE.UU.: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-09669-8_15
  10. Clarke, D. & Hollingsworth, H. (2000). Seeing is understanding. Journal of Staff Development 21(4), 40-43.
  11. Climent, N. & Carrillo, J. (2007). El uso del vídeo para el análisis de la práctica en entornos colaborativos. Investigación en la Escuela 61, 23-35.
  12. Design-Based Researcher Collective (2003). Design- Based Research: An Emerging paradigm for Educational Inquiry. Educational Researcher 32(1), 5-8.
  13. Flavell, J.H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist 34(10), 906-911. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
  14. Goffree, F. & Oonk, W. (2001). Digitizing real teaching practice for teacher education programmes: the MILE approach. In F. Lin & T. Cooney (Eds.), Making Sense of Mathematics Teacher Education (pp. 111-146). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI: 1874/ 127929
  15. González, J. & Wagenaar, R. (Eds.). (2003). Tuning educational structures in Europe. Informe final. Fase uno. Bilbao, España: Universidad de Deusto y Universidad de Groningen.
  16. Guba, E. & Lincoln, Y. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 105-117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  17. Kazemi, E. & Hubbard, A. (2008). New Directions for the Design and Study of Professional Development: Attending to the Coevolution of Teachers’ Participation across Contexts. Journal of Teacher Education 59 (5), 428-441. DOI: 10.1177/0022487108324330
  18. Koc, Y., Peker, D. & Osmanoglu, A. (2009). Supporting teacher professional development through online video case study discussions: An assemblage of preservice and inservice teachers and the case teacher. Teaching and Teacher Education 25 (8), 1158–1168. DOI: 10.1016/ j.tate.2009.02.020
  19. Lampert, M., & Ball, D.L. (1998). Teaching, Multimedia and Mathematics: Investigations of Real Practice. New York, EE.UU.: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
  20. Leikin, R. & Zazkis, R. (2010). Learning Through Teaching Mathematics. Development of teachers’ knowledge and expertise in practice. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
  21. Lin, P. J. (2005). Using research-based video-cases to help pre-service primary teachers conceptualize a contemporary view of mathematics teaching. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 3, 351–377.
  22. Llinares, S. & Valls, J. (2010). Prospective primary mathematics teachers’ learning from on-line discussions in a virtual video-based environment. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 13 (2), 177-196. DOI: 10.1007/s10857-009-9133-0
  23. Masingila, J. O. & Doerr, H. M. (2002). Understanding pre-service teachers’ emerging practices through their analysis of a multimedia case study of practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 5 (3), 235–263.
  24. Mason, J. (2002). Researching your own practice: The discipline of noticing. London, England: Routledge Falmer.
  25. Mochón, S. & Morales, M. (2010). En qué consiste el “conocimiento matemático para la enseñanza” de un profesor y cómo fomentar su desarrollo: un estudio en la escuela primaria. Educación Matemática 22 (1), 87-113.
  26. Pajares, M.F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research 62 (3), 307-332. DOI: 10.3102/00346543062003307
  27. Perrenoud, P.H. (2004). Diez nuevas competencias para enseñar. Barcelona, España: Graó.
  28. Ponte, J.P. (1994). Mathematics teachers’ professional knowledge. In J. P. da Ponte & J. F. Matos (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18th International Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. (Vol. 1, pp. 195-210). Lisboa, Portugal: University of Lisbon.
  29. Rodríguez, P. (2000). Los medios como recurso reflexivo en las Prácticas para ser Maestro. Comunicar 14, 200-207.
  30. Santagata, R., Zannoni, C. & Stigler, J. W. (2007). The role of lesson analysis in pre-service teacher education: an empirical investigation of teacher learning from a virtual video-based field experience. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 10 (2), 123-140. DOI: 10.1007/s10857007-9029-9
  31. Schuck, S. (1996). Chains in primary teacher mathematics education courses: An analysis of powerful constraints. Mathematics Education Research Journal 8 (2), 119-136.
  32. Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher 15 (2), 4-14. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X015002004
  33. Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform. Harvard Educational Review 57 (1), 1-22.
  34. Sorto, M. A., Marshall, J. H., Luschei, T. F. & Carnoy, M. (2009). Teacher knowledge and teaching in Panama and Costa Rica: A comparative study in primary and secondary education. Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación en Matemática Educativa 12 (2), 251-290.
  35. Sosa, L. (2011). Conocimiento matemático para la enseñanza en Bachillerato. Un estudio de dos casos. Huelva, España: Universidad de Huelva. (Disponible en http://rabida.uhu.es/dspace// handle/10272/4509)
  36. Star, J. R. & Strickland, S. K. (2008). Learning to observe: Using video to improve preservice mathematics teachers’ ability to notice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 11 (2), 107-125. DOI: 10.1007/s10857-007-9063-7
  37. Steffe, L. & Thompson, P. W. (2000). Teaching experiment methodology: underlying principles and essential elements. In A. Nelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 267-306). Mahwah: NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  38. Viseu, F. & Ponte, J.P. (2009). Desenvolvimento do conhecimento didáctico do futuro professor de matemática com apoio das TIC. Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación en Matemática Educativa 12 (3), 383-413.
  39. Zeichner, K.M. (1993). El maestro como profesional reflexivo. Cuadernos de pedagogía 220,44-49.