Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Logo Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación en Matemática Educativa

Special Article

Vol. 9 No. 4 (2006): Número Especial/ Diciembre

SEMIOTIC OBJECTIFICATIONS OF THE COMPENSATION STRATEGY: EN ROUTE TO THE REIFICATION OF INTEGERS

Submitted
October 28, 2024
Published
2006-12-30

Abstract

We report an analysis of data from an experimental replication of “Object-Process Linking and Embedding” (OPLE) in the case of integer arithmetic instruction originally developed by Linchevski and Williams (1999) in the realistic mathematics education (RME) tradition. Our analysis applies Radford’s theory of semiotic objectification to reveal new insights into how reification is achieved. In particular the method of analysis shows how the factual generalization of the so-called compensation strategy encapsulates the notion that “adding to one side is the same as subtracting from the other side”: a vital grounding for symbolic integer operations later. Other aspects of objectification are discussed that are considered likely to be important to the semiotic chaining that students achieve in the OPLE sequence that can lead to an intuitive grounding of integer operations. We argue that semiotic theory needs to be elaborated to understand the vital role of models and modelling in leveraging reifications in RME.

References

  1. Cobb, P. (1994). Where Is the Mind? Constructivist and Sociocultural Perspectives on Mathematical Development. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 13-20.
  2. Cobb, P., Gravemeijer, K., Yackel, E., McClain, K., & Whitenack, J. (1997). Mathematizing and Symbolizing: The Emergence of Chains of Signification in One First-Grade Classroom.
  3. In D. Kirshner & J. A. Whitson (Eds.), Situated Cognition. Social, Semiotic, and Psychological Perspectives (pp. 151-233). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  4. Dirks, M. K. (1984). The integer abacus. Arithmetic Teacher, 31(7), 50–54.
  5. Goodson-Espy, T. (1998). The roles of reification and reflective abstraction in the development of abstract thought: transitions from arithmetic to algebra. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 36(3), 219-245.
  6. Gravemeijer, K. (1997a). Instructional design for reform in mathematics education. In K. P. E. G. M. Beishuizen, and E.C.D.M. van Lieshout (Ed.), The Role of Contexts and Models in the Development of Mathematical Strategies and Procedures (pp. 13-34). Utrecht: CD-ß Press.
  7. Gravemeijer, K. (1997b). Mediating Between Concrete and Abstract. In T. Nunez & P. Bryant (Eds.), Learning and Teaching in Mathematics. An International Perspective (pp. 315-345). Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.
  8. Gravemeijer, K. (1997c). Solving word problems: A case of modelling? Learning and Instruction, 7(4), 389-397.
  9. Gravemeijer, K., Cobb, P., Bowers, J., & Whitenack, J. (2000). Symbolising, Modelling and Instructional Design. Perspectives on Discourse, Tools and Instructional Design. In P. Cobb, E. Yackel & K. McClain (Eds.), Symbolizing and Communicating in Mathematics Classrooms (pp. 225-273). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  10. Koukkoufis, A., & Williams, J. (2005). Integer Operations in the Primary School: A Semiotic Analysis of a «Factual Generalization». Paper presented at the British Society for Research in to the Learning of Mathematics Day Conference November 2005, St. Martin’s College, Lancaster.
  11. Liebeck, P. (1990). Scores and forfeits – an intuitive model for integer arithmetic. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 21(3), 221–239.
  12. Linchevski, L., & Williams, J. (1999). Using intuition from everyday life in ‘filling’ the gap in children’s extension of their number concept to include the negative numbers. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 39(1-3), 131-147.
  13. Lytle, P. A. (1994). Investigation of a model based on neutralization of opposites to teach integers. Paper presented at the Nineteenth International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.
  14. Radford, L. (2002). The seen, the spoken and the written. A semiotic approach to the problem of objectification of mathematical knowledge. For the Learning of Mathematics, 22(2), 14-23.
  15. Radford, L. (2003). Gestures, speech, and the sprouting of signs. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 5(1), 37-70.
  16. Radford, L. (2005). The semiotics of the schema. Kant, Piaget, and the Calculator. In M. H. G. Hoffmann, J. Lenhard & F. Seeger (Eds.), Activity and Sign. Grounding Mathematics Education (pp. 137-152). New York: Springer.
  17. Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22, 1-36.
  18. Sfard, A., & Linchevski, L. (1994). The gains and pitfalls of reification: the case of algebra. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26, 87–124.
  19. Walkerdine, V. (1988). The mastery of reason. London: Routledge.
  20. Williams, J. & Wake, G. (in press). Metaphors and models in translation between College and workplace mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.